The indictment and the report also indicate additional hacks and transfers of information that never became public, including the transfer of stolen materials to an undisclosed congressional candidate.Īccording to U.S.
WikiLeaks never released any of the data it stole in the final attack, and there is no discussion in either the indictment or the Mueller report of what the GRU did with the data.Analytics are some of the most critical assets a campaign owns, often valued at hundreds of thousands of dollars.These computers contained test applications related to the DNC’s analytics,” which the hackers copied and stole. On September 20, 2016, after Russia transferred files to WikiLeaks, members of the same Russian military-intelligence unit “also successfully gained access to DNC computers hosted on a third-party cloud-computing service.Metadata on files found on the computers of Russian hackers suggests that they had completed their transfer of emails stolen from John Podesta’s inbox to WikiLeaks in mid-September 2016.Russian intelligence worked with a cutout, WikiLeaks, to disseminate the stolen information.They gained access to the servers of the Democratic National Committee as early as the summer of 2015 John Podesta’s emails were compromised in March 2016.Russian hackers from the GRU, the Kremlin’s military-intelligence directorate, conducted multiple rounds of hacking that resulted in the theft of sensitive data and emails from the Democratic National Committee and Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta.What did they do with the valuable information they stole but did not release?.Russian intelligence stole data from the DNC as late as September 20, 2016.It did not release the DNC analytics and campaign plans. Russian military-intelligence hackers stole confidential political data from the Democratic National Committee that they did not release through WikiLeaks.
0 kommentar(er)
